Chapter 6: Trust · Chapter 4: Kindness · Chapter 3: Knowledge & Wisdom

What to say when they say "we're happy with our current provider"

By the Niles team · · 7 min read

The short answer

Agree with them, because being well served is good news, not something to argue with. Then ask one question about what is changing in their business, not about what is wrong with their provider. Never criticise the incumbent. If no opening appears, agree a specific reason and date to talk again, and follow up on it.

  • "We're happy" usually means they have no reason to review yet, not that they have compared you and said no.
  • Never criticise the incumbent: the person who chose them is the one you are talking to.
  • Ask about what is changing in their business, not about what is wrong with their supplier.
  • If the timing is wrong, leave with an agreed reason and date to come back, then keep your message consistent.

You finally get the operations director on the phone, or across the table, and before you reach your second point they say it: "Thanks, but we're happy with our current provider." Most salespeople either fold and say goodbye, or start listing reasons the incumbent is worse.

Neither works. There is a third route: agree, get curious about what is changing, and leave with a reason to speak again.

What "we're happy with our current provider" usually means

Usually it means "I don't have a reason to spend time on this", not "I've compared you and said no". The prospect hasn't evaluated you. They have filed you under "suppliers who want us to switch" and closed the drawer.

It can mean one of three things, and your job in the next minute is to find out which:

  • They are genuinely well served. Fine. You want to be the obvious second choice when that changes.
  • They haven't thought about it. The relationship works well enough, and reviewing it feels like effort with no upside.
  • It's a polite way to end the call. Common with senior people, especially on a first approach.

Behind all three sits risk. The Pharaoh's Pitch points out in chapter 3 that a B2B buyer is personally exposed when they pick a supplier: the company will scrutinise their judgement, and a wrong choice can follow them in their career.

Chapter 4 makes a related point about the harmony inside the client's organisation. As Ivan Yong puts it in chapter 4:

Whenever we bring in a new solution or a new product to a buyer, especially in the case of B2B sales, we ultimately disrupt the balance that has been in place for some time.

So "we're happy" is often less a verdict on their provider than a reasonable wish not to disturb something that works. Argue with it and you confirm their fear.

What to say in the moment

Agree with them, sincerely, then ask one question about their business rather than their provider. Agreeing removes any need for them to defend their decision. The question gives them something more interesting to think about than how to end the call.

An insurance broker calling the finance director of an SME in Petaling Jaya about group cover might say:

"That's good to hear, and I wouldn't suggest moving something that works. Before I let you go, can I ask one thing? When your group medical comes up for renewal, is anything changing on your side: headcount, a new office, benefits you want to add?"

A SaaS account executive speaking to a CFO in Singapore:

"Makes sense. A finance system that works isn't something anyone swaps lightly. Out of curiosity, what would have to happen for you to look at it again? A new entity, a regional rollout, a tougher audit?"

A consultant approaching a regional bank in London:

"Fair enough, and I'm not calling to replace anyone. I'm calling because we've been doing a lot of work on [the specific regulatory change] this year. Is that something your current advisers already have covered, or is it still open?"

Notice what none of them ask: "What don't you like about your provider?" That question asks the prospect to criticise their own decision to a stranger. Few people will, and nobody enjoys it.

Questions that open the door without attacking the incumbent

The best questions point at change, not fault: what is coming up, what they value, and what they would add. They let a contented prospect talk about their business without feeling they are building a case against their supplier.

Pick one or two, not all of them:

  • "What do they do particularly well for you?" You learn the standard you would have to meet, and people enjoy answering.
  • "If you could add one thing to what you get today, what would it be?"
  • "What's changing in the business over the next year that your provider will need to keep up with?"
  • "When did you last look at the market, and what made you stay?"
  • "If you ever did review it, who else would want a say?"

These land better when you have done your homework. A question about their expansion into Vietnam gets a real answer; a generic "what keeps you up at night" gets a shrug. If you are meeting rather than calling, use how to prepare for a first sales meeting to find one specific thing worth asking about.

If you want to rehearse the pivot before the real call, Niles' role-play tool will play a contented client and debrief you afterwards.

Why criticising the current provider backfires

The person you are talking to chose that provider, or works beside the person who did. Criticise the provider and you have criticised them, in a way they can't easily answer without losing face.

Chapter 4 of the book explains this through "giving face". It asks you to treat the client as an "individual-in-relation": someone whose standing with colleagues is present in the conversation even when the colleagues aren't.

You choose your words so that nothing you say would diminish them in front of their own people. In practice, that rules out every version of "your current broker is overcharging you".

The book describes giving face as rooted in Asian, especially Chinese, culture and recommends learning it for anyone selling in Asian markets. There is more on that in selling to Malaysian and Singapore buyers.

Sometimes the prospect invites you to criticise: "So what do you think of [competitor]?" Don't take the bait:

"They're well regarded, and I'd be surprised if they weren't doing a good job for you. Where we tend to differ is [one specific thing]. Whether that matters depends on where you're taking the business, which is why I asked."

You have been generous to the incumbent, made one clear point of difference, and handed the comparison back to the person whose job it is to make it.

The book's lens: dispel pride and prejudice instead of arguing with them

The Pharaoh's Pitch takes its title from the Pharaoh who refused Moses again and again. Chapter 6 asks whether you ever feel you are pitching to a client like that: settled in their own reality, unmoved by any facts or figures you bring. A prospect who is happy with their current provider is a mild version of the same thing.

The chapter names two forces. Prejudice is a preconceived opinion: the prospect has met salespeople before, files you with them, and sees nothing to learn. Pride is the belief that they already know what is best for their organisation, so your pitch sounds like preaching to the converted.

The chapter's view is that pitching means helping a client set those notions aside long enough to listen, not out-arguing them. As Ivan Yong puts it in chapter 6:

Your role is to create an authentic conversational space where you are able to encourage your client to suspend their prejudice and keep their pride in check while they lend you their ear.

That changes what you do with "we're happy". You don't rebut it with features, which only confirms the prejudice that you are there to sell. You agree, which leaves their pride intact.

Then you do what the chapter recommends for overcoming pride: understand who the client is, what they have achieved and where they want to go next. Every question in the list above is a version of that.

Chapter 3 adds the order of operations. It separates authority, the right to be listened to, from power, the force that makes someone buy. Sellers who reach for power first, through pressure and deadlines, win hollow deals if they win at all.

A happy prospect hasn't given you the right to propose a switch yet, so your first job is to earn the next conversation. For how that right is earned face to face, see building trust in the first meeting.

How to follow up when the answer is "not now"

If nothing surfaces, ask permission to come back at a specific moment, ideally tied to something in their calendar, and then do exactly that. One agreed, dated reason to call is worth more than a dozen "just checking in" emails.

Close the call like this:

"I'll leave it there. Would it be all right if I got in touch in February, before your renewal? If something changes before then, an acquisition or a new site, you've got my details."

Then send a short note the same day:

"Subject: Before your March renewal. Hi [Name], thanks for your time today, and good to hear [provider] is looking after you. As agreed, I'll be in touch in February. In the meantime, here's the one-page note on [topic] I mentioned, in case it helps with the planning you described. Best regards, [Your name]"

Chapter 6 makes two points that apply here. First, the pitch doesn't end when the conversation does: follow-ups work better when they pick up from where you first met the client, and the chapter even suggests holding something back to give the later conversation substance.

Second, keep your message consistent across every contact, because consistency is what tells a client you are steadfast and can be trusted. If you talked about their regional expansion in March, February's call should be about that, not a new pitch.

Don't give up too early either. The same chapter describes salespeople dropping a prospect at the first sign of rejection and writing them off as a poor lead, and chapter 3 calls refusing to capitulate at the first "no" a form of courage.

Treat "we're happy" as "not now" unless they tell you otherwise. If interest later turns into a stall, see what to say when a prospect needs to think it over, and for the emails themselves, how to follow up after a sales meeting.

Frequently asked questions

What do you say when a prospect says they already have a vendor?

Treat it as good news, then ask about the future rather than the vendor. For example: "Good to hear. If something changed in the business next year, what would make you look again?" That keeps the conversation open without asking them to criticise a supplier they chose, and it tells you whether there is a real opening or simply a date to come back.

Is "we're happy with our current provider" a real objection or a brush-off?

It can be either, and often it is neither: the prospect simply has no reason yet to spend time on a review. One sincere question about what is changing in their business will usually tell you which. If they engage, you have a conversation to build on. If they close it down twice, accept it gracefully and ask when you may come back.

How do you compete with an incumbent without criticising them?

Compete on what is coming, not on what went wrong. Be generous about the incumbent, name one specific way you differ, and let the buyer decide whether that difference matters for their plans. Criticising the current supplier criticises the person who chose them, which pushes them to defend the decision instead of reconsidering it.

When should you follow up with someone who says "try me in six months"?

Agree a reason as well as a date: a renewal, a budget cycle, a planned expansion. Contact them a few weeks before that moment, refer back to what they told you, and bring something useful. If they named no trigger, six months is fine, but an unprompted email with nothing new in it is easy to ignore however well it is timed.